Subject	you only get to go 170 instead of 180 (n/m)
Posted by	Guapo on April 09, 2003 at 10:04 PM
	This message has been viewed 27 times.
In Reply To	From Robert@Z1 Motorsports: posted by Jackie Chan (Hoping...) on April 09, 2003 at 10:00 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Those of you TT's with N/A Gears in the back. How are they?? (n/m) - gq300z 20:38:13 04/09/03 fine (n/m) - Tennyson (ATL) 20:56:54 04/09/03 Nice feel on a moderately modified TT, sideways in 3rd - Russell@Z1 21:07:59 04/09/03 Perhaps this is a stupid question... - Xi0nX4 (ohio) 22:18:35 04/09/03 The casings are not the same. (n/m) - Russell@Z1 22:54:04 04/09/03 Bah. Wouldn't you miss that god-like power up top? (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 21:13:41 04/09/03 160mph not fast enough for you? (n/m) - FNFAZTT 21:24:09 04/09/03 I'm not talking top speed, I'm talking top end acceleration. (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 21:36:12 04/09/03 lol you are lost (n/m) - TARGETZ 21:48:10 04/09/03 2nd (n/m) - LedZep(Ready for a TT) 21:53:15 04/09/03 From Robert@Z1 Motorsports: - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 22:00:40 04/09/03 you only get to go 170 instead of 180 (n/m) - Guapo 22:04:11 04/09/03 But my understanding was... - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 22:08:11 04/09/03 no. Accelleration will be higher in each gear, - Guapo 22:11:24 04/09/03 Ah, I see. Thanks for explaining! - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 22:19:11 04/09/03 No, Acceleration is actually quicker up high as well as low - Xi0nX4 (ohio) 22:12:01 04/09/03 Ohh, okay, I understand now. Thanks! - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 22:18:05 04/09/03 You are getting better accelleration from 0-160... - LedZep(Ready for a TT) 22:14:24 04/09/03 Ok, I see. Thinking about getting a TT? - Jackie Chan (Hoping...) 22:49:44 04/09/03 I trying to save up for it (n/m) - LedZep(Ready for a TT) 10:00:10 04/10/03 lets see, hmmm, nope. 180 atleast. (n/m) - genic 21:46:28 04/09/03 On a 285/35/18 Wheel, yes, 180mph :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 22:28:53 04/09/03 Some reading for ya :) - ZBlacktt 21:25:24 04/09/03 cut your car in half, and weld a lexus sc from halfway back - joel(PA) 21:41:28 04/09/03 lol, nice sig :) (n/m) - Spee 23:17:40 04/09/03 Whatever that was supposed to mean (n/m) - gq300z 16:38:01 04/10/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.